A Bibliometric Analysis of the Landscape of Cancer Rehabilitation Research (1992-2016).

Cancer rehabilitation research has accelerated as great attention has focused on improving survivorship care. Recent expert consensus has attempted to prioritize research needs and suggests greater focus on studying physical functioning of survivors. However, no analysis of the publication landscape has substantiated these proposed needs. This manuscript provides an analysis of PubMed indexed articles related to cancer rehabilitation published between 1992 and 2017. A total of 22 171 publications were analyzed using machine learning and text analysis to assess publication metrics, topic areas of emphasis, and their interrelationships through topic similarity networks. Publications have increased at a rate of 136 articles per year. Approximately 10% of publications were funded by the National Institutes of Health institutes and centers, with the National Cancer Institute being the most prominent funder. The greatest volume and rate of publication increase were in the topics of Cognitive and Behavioral Therapies and Psychological Interventions, followed by Depression and Exercise Therapy. Four research topic similarity networks were identified and provide insight on areas of robust publication and notable deficits. Findings suggest that publication emphasis has strongly supported cognitive, behavioral, and psychological therapies; however, studies of functional morbidity and physical rehabilitation research are lacking. Three areas of publication deficits are noted: research on populations outside of breast, prostate, and lung cancers; methods for integrating physical rehabilitation services with cancer care, specifically regarding functional screening and assessment; and physical rehabilitation interventions. These deficits align with the needs identified by expert consensus and support the supposition that future research should emphasize a focus on physical rehabilitation.

Walking ability and its relationship to lower-extremity muscle strength in children with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

OBJECTIVE: To describe gait deficits and their association with lower-extremity muscle strength in children with juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive study. SETTING: Clinical research center. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive sample of 25 ambulatory children diagnosed with juvenile IIM. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Manual muscle test (MMT) of bilateral hip flexor, extensor, and abductor; knee extensor; and ankle plantarflexor strength, all measured on a 0- to 10-point scale and summary strength measures. Video-based movement analysis to determine walking speed; gait cycle time; right and left step time; stride length; right and left step length; and stance, swing, and double-limb support phase durations. RESULTS: Walking speed (1.03+/-0.27 m/s) was reduced because of shortened stride lengths (1.03+/-0.21 m) more than prolonged gait cycle times (1.05+/-0.22s). Walking speed highly correlated with the number of muscle groups weaker than grade 7 out of 10 (r=-.89) and the strength of the hip flexors (r=.85). CONCLUSIONS: Lower-extremity strength measures, including MMT scores of individual muscle groups and the number of weak muscle groups, were predictive of gait limitations in children with juvenile IIM.